{"id":61,"date":"2026-05-21T12:05:31","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T12:05:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61"},"modified":"2026-05-21T12:05:31","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T12:05:31","slug":"port-cities-try-to-weather-shifting-winds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61","title":{"rendered":"Port cities try to weather shifting winds"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p><strong><mark>FORTY-TWO ACRES <\/mark><\/strong>of vacant industrial land \u2014 a patchwork of asphalt, weeds, and grass \u2014 sit waiting in Salem\u2019s harbor. In the center is a coal power plant, shut down in 2014 after a decade of community activism, and a natural gas plant, retired in 2018. The city identified the lot, roughly 30 football fields in size, to be the site for Salem\u2019s offshore wind terminal, which would be the third in the state after the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal opened in 2015 and the city began its phased opening of the Foss Marine Terminal in 2023.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=59\">Barney Frank, 86, left mark as trailblazer in politics<\/a><\/p>\n<p>But strong political winds have, at least for now, changed the course for Salem. <\/p>\n<p>For the city\u2019s climate advocates, the prospective terminal represents decades of work toward a cleaner, renewable energy future, one that the state has been putting money and policy behind for years and that has promised to bring thousands of jobs and other community investments. Salem and New Bedford both received millions from the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MassCEC) to develop the sites of retired fossil fuel power plants into terminals that would serve as logistics and operations centers for the construction of offshore wind. But wind projects have long been struggling to get off the ground. During the Biden administration, global supply chain disruption, climbing inflation, and high interest rates drove up costs for developers. The Trump administration\u2019s anti-wind actions \u2014 issuing executive orders that block new projects, pausing existing leases, and rescinding grants \u2014 drove both cities further from the economic boon they expected. <\/p>\n<p>In New Bedford, the influx of tenants that was hoped for never materialized. In Salem, the plan was to build two berths to receive ships carrying crew and materials for wind projects. But construction is stalled and there\u2019s no start date in sight. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe expected a lot of jobs, like a lot of life-changing \u2026 career sustainable jobs that were going to come from this, and that\u2019s what hasn\u2019t materialized,\u201d said Sam Lambert, deputy chapter director for the Sierra Club\u2019s Massachusetts\u2019 chapter, of the Salem terminal and the offshore wind projects it might have supported. <\/p>\n<p>In New Bedford, the terminal has had to shift its vision. It\u2019s leaning on general cargo and marine construction for additional revenue.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe were operating under a plan where, when the first [wind farm] gets first electricity, it would start doing its operation and maintenance work out of our facility,\u201d said Andrew Saunders, president of the New Bedford Foss Marine Terminal. But with the current political climate, \u201cthe terminal has had to pivot in order to generate revenue, and figure out something of a different identity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In 2022, Gov. Charlie Baker signed into law a clean energy bill that codified a goal to procure 5,600 megawatts of offshore wind by June of 2027. In 2023, the Department of Energy released an Offshore Wind Strategy to meet President Biden\u2019s goal to deploy 30 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind energy by 2030 to power 10 million homes, support 77,000 jobs, and create $12 billion per year in direct private investment. In 2024, to meet the state\u2019s ambitious climate goals, Gov. Maura Healey pursued deals with three offshore wind developers for a total of 2,678 megawatts of electricity. There are a handful of offshore wind projects off the coast of Massachusetts whose statuses range from proposed to operational \u2014 including Vineyard Wind 1, the country\u2019s first commercial offshore wind project to begin initial operations, though it has been imperiled by a contract dispute with General Electric. Vineyard Wind 2, which is still without permits, intended to use Salem as its port.<\/p>\n<p>Building commercial scale offshore wind requires tremendous amounts of labor. According to Vineyard Wind 1\u2019s most recent , the project has supported 3,725 jobs since it began. Operations and maintenance is expected to sustain approximately 80 to 100 jobs per year moving forward.  <\/p>\n<p>Salem and New Bedford saw an economic opportunity in the burgeoning wind industry, and the state was happy to lend support. In December of 2022, MassCEC and the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs announced $180 millionin funding for ports and infrastructure projects for offshore wind in the state. That included $75 million to Salem and Crowley Wind Services \u2014 an offshore wind solutions company \u2014 to convert the coal-fired power plant and $15 million to New Bedford\u2019s Foss Marine Terminal for the redevelopment of the former Eversource Energy\/Sprague Oil power plant.<\/p>\n<p>These ports would serve as landlords to the companies installing the wind turbines who would rent the terminal site for a few years at a time to facilitate the construction of their projects, and use them to a lesser degree long term for operations and maintenance. But many of the wind projects around the state are stuck in limbo, some without permits at all. Experts believe it will remain that way at least until the Trump administration leaves office.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere has been this chilling effect on the industry,\u201d said Kate Sinding Daly, senior vice president for law and policy at the Conservation Law Foundation.<\/p>\n<p>The hurdles began in January of 2025 when Trump issued an executive order halting new leases for offshore wind. In early December of 2025, a judge overturned the order but no new wind leases have been issued by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. In late December, wind companies received what became referred to as the \u201cChristmas surprise.\u201d Five wind projects, including three from Massachusetts, had their leases paused by the Trump administration, citing national security concerns about radar interference that can create false targets. While the court issued preliminary injunctions temporarily reversing the order, the delays took a toll on the projects. The developers for Vineyard Wind 1 said in  that they were losing $2.3 million per day while the operation was shut down. <\/p>\n<p>There \u201creally isn\u2019t any pipeline anymore, because of the changes in federal policy, and which is unfortunate, because those are very large projects that would have invested a sizable amount of money into the port in New Bedford,\u201d said New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell.<\/p>\n<p>According to Salem\u2019s Mayor Dominick Pangallo, the original Salem Offshore Wind Terminal Project was estimated to cost between $250 and $300 million. (In addition to the $75 million from MassCEC and the state, the project was supposed to receive roughly $36 million in federal grants.) The remainder would come from private funding. Salem Alliance for the Environment (SAFE), along with neighborhood associations and civic groups, formed a coalition to weigh in on the project. These advocates worked for three years to develop a community benefits agreement with Crowley Wind Services. The agreement included hiring targets for local, women, and minority residents, $400,000 in scholarships for offshore wind or maritime-related career paths, $1.25 million for additional personnel in the Harbormaster\u2019s Department to help with the maritime operation of the terminal, and more than $3.5 million for Salem public schools and educational programs. <\/p>\n<p>The Massachusetts Building Trades Union brokered an agreement to provide labor for the construction. The city spent considerable staff time working on the project.<\/p>\n<p>But in August of 2025, the Department of Transportation rescinded $34 million of the $36 million in federal grant money from the project, undermining the financial viability of the plans. Crowley Wind Services declined to comment on the status of the project, but Pangallo said the absence of the grant has caused disruption and led to a loss in jobs, property tax revenues, and harbor usage fees. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s not the entirety of the project cost, but it was enough to create some challenges to making the project manageable. So the city and [Mass]CEC and Crowley [are] working to try to identify ways to manage that loss of funding,\u201d Pangallo said. \u201cDelays to the project may also expose it to increased costs from inflation, which can be significant for a project this scale.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bonnie Bain, SAFE\u2019s executive director, said that she could see where things were headed long before the grant was rescinded. But even though it was expected, it was still \u201ca gut punch\u201d to discover that the project was delayed and the community benefits might never be realized. <\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=57\">Enbridge proposes new gas pipeline expansion in New England, placing Mass. in the crosshairs<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s awful and demoralizing to [know] we did all that, and it was done as right as we could with the timeline we had \u2026 and the results aren\u2019t coming,\u2019\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Labor organizations are also reeling from the chaos caused by the Trump administration. They\u2019ve invested money to train workers on wind construction, including paying for the Global Wind Organisation (GWO) mandatory training that offers instruction on sea survival and rescue. It can cost $2,000 or more per worker and is valid for only two years. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is definitely a burden to get your people trained,\u201d said Steve Barry, business manager for IBEW Local 223. \u201cThen the hope is that they\u2019re going to continue in this industry, which now obviously [has] a pause on it.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Frank Callahan, president of Massachusetts Building Trades Union, said that job opportunities beyond the terminals and the wind farms have been impacted by the political climate around wind. Prysmian, the company set to build a deep-sea cable manufacturing plant at Brayton Point in Somerset, Mass., had signed a letter of intent to use union labor. The $300 million venture would have provided over 100 manufacturing jobs and produced components needed to bring electricity from the sea to land. But days before Trump took office, Prysmian walked away from the project.<\/p>\n<p>The 26-acre New Bedford Foss Marine Terminal served as the marshaling place for materials, like food and fuel, that went out to the job site of Vineyard Wind 1. (The majority of turbine components flowed through New Bedford\u2019s Marine Commerce Terminal and were prepared for installation there.) And it will continue to be the site for aspects of Vineyard Wind 1\u2019s operations and maintenance. But the terminal has not secured tenants for future wind projects, which Saunders expected to be the majority of its business. He said he is negotiating with wind developers to revive letters of intent that have expired.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, the terminal\u2019s business consists of marine construction \u2014 such as bridge building and seismic work for pre-development of wind projects \u2014 as well as non-wind related shipping. <\/p>\n<p>Mitchell says that because the Port of New Bedford, which consists of multiple terminals and piers, is such a successful fishing port, the slow down in the wind industry has not impacted the overall economics.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis continues to be the top fishing port in the country. \u2026 Our efforts in offshore wind \u2026 remain about diversification,\u201d said Mitchell.<\/p>\n<p>Saunders refers to the Foss Marine Terminal as \u201cnot yet grown up\u201d and is sticking to the belief that wind will play an increasingly important role in its future. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re not walking away from offshore wind, because we think that that is a valid market,\u201d Saunders said, adding that they have a \u201cphase 3\u201d plan during which they will expand the terminal\u2019s number of active berths from 2 to 10. These additional berths are intended for offshore wind construction. <\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Salem, MassCEC, and Crowley Wind Services are working to revise the design of their port to account for the $34 million cut in federal funding. Pangallo says that one alternative is to develop only one berth for now and add a second in a future year when the industry demand is stronger. And more funding may come yet. Lawmakers are weighing a proposal from Gov. Healey that would redirect $70 million from an unutilized offshore wind tax incentive into a MassCEC fund that could be used to support construction at the Salem port.<\/p>\n<p>In an email statement to <em>CommonWealth Beacon<\/em>, Crowley officials said the company remains \u201cdedicated to developing the site into a versatile marine logistics hub for the future\u201d and is \u201ccontinuing to work with our public and private partners on the best path forward for supporting Massachusetts and New England\u2019s energy and economic needs.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>And, experts believe, the wind industry will be strong again. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe think of it as a slowing down, not a stop,\u201d said Daly of the Conservation Law Foundation. \u201cWhen there is an administration in power again that acknowledges that climate change is real and that offshore wind has a huge role to play in addressing the threats from climate change \u2026 the developers will come back.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Until then, there\u2019s other work to do, says Bain of SAFE. She says wind isn\u2019t the only solution to climate change, nor the only job creator. SAFE is working on job development for solar, geothermal, and micro-grid projects in Salem. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think the shiny object is obviously the port, but we need \u2026 electricians for solar, we need HVAC folks. There\u2019s all kinds of clean energy pathways that are not halted right now,\u201d said Bain. She said she is committed to working \u201cin our little sandbox, where we have actual power.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><em>Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that the Salem offshore wind terminal would be the second in the state. It would be the third.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=55\">House eyes guardrails for drone weaponization, surveillance<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Salem and New Bedford both received millions from the state to develop the sites of retired fossil fuel power plants into terminals that would serve as logistics and operations centers for the construction of offshore wind. But wind projects have long been struggling to get off the ground.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":60,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Port cities try to weather shifting winds - Worcester Moving Report<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Port cities try to weather shifting winds - Worcester Moving Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Salem and New Bedford both received millions from the state to develop the sites of retired fossil fuel power plants into terminals that would serve as logistics and operations centers for the construction of offshore wind. But wind projects have long been struggling to get off the ground.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Worcester Moving Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-21T12:05:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/690f2c82d115bde885a331998fa0eae0\"},\"headline\":\"Port cities try to weather shifting winds\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-21T12:05:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61\"},\"wordCount\":2177,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Energy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61\",\"name\":\"Port cities try to weather shifting winds - Worcester Moving Report\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-21T12:05:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/690f2c82d115bde885a331998fa0eae0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":1333},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?p=61#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Port cities try to weather shifting winds\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Worcester Moving Report\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/690f2c82d115bde885a331998fa0eae0\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/worcestermovingreport.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Port cities try to weather shifting winds - Worcester Moving Report","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Port cities try to weather shifting winds - Worcester Moving Report","og_description":"Salem and New Bedford both received millions from the state to develop the sites of retired fossil fuel power plants into terminals that would serve as logistics and operations centers for the construction of offshore wind. But wind projects have long been struggling to get off the ground.","og_url":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61","og_site_name":"Worcester Moving Report","article_published_time":"2026-05-21T12:05:31+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/690f2c82d115bde885a331998fa0eae0"},"headline":"Port cities try to weather shifting winds","datePublished":"2026-05-21T12:05:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61"},"wordCount":2177,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg","articleSection":["Energy"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61","url":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61","name":"Port cities try to weather shifting winds - Worcester Moving Report","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-21T12:05:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/690f2c82d115bde885a331998fa0eae0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0f67e1edb8b65c1bc94a23f9cde2ed50.jpg","width":2000,"height":1333},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?p=61#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Port cities try to weather shifting winds"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/","name":"Worcester Moving Report","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/#\/schema\/person\/690f2c82d115bde885a331998fa0eae0","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com"],"url":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=61"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/60"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=61"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=61"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worcestermovingreport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=61"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}